Competition between bottom-up visual input and internal inhibition generates error neurons in a model of the mouse primary visual cortex

Javier Galván Fraile1, Franz Scherr2, José J. Ramasco1, Anton Arkhipov3, Wolfgang Maass2, Claudio R. Mirasso1

1Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
2Institute of Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16b/I, Graz, 8010, Austria.
3Mindscope Program, Allen Institute, 615 Westlake Ave N, Seattle, 98109, Washington, USA.

(April 2023)

The predictive coding theory, although attractive, is far from being proven. Supporters of this theory agree that bottom-up sensory inputs and top-down predictions of these inputs must be compared in certain types of neurons called error neurons. Excitatory neurons in layer 2/3 (E2/3) of the primary visual cortex (V1) are ideal candidates to act as error neurons, although how these error neurons are generated is poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to gain insight into how the genetically encoded structure of canonical microcircuits in the neocortex implements the emergence of error neurons. To this end, we used a biologically realistic computational model of V1, developed by the Allen Institute, to study the effect that sudden changes in bottom-up input had on the dynamics of E2/3 neurons. We found that the responses of these neurons can be divided into two main classes: one that depolarized (reporting positive errors; dVf neurons) and one that hyperpolarized (reporting negative errors; hVf neurons). Detailed analysis of both network and effective connectivity allowed us to uncover the mechanism that led to the dynamic segregation of these neurons. This mechanism was found to be the competition between the external visual input, originating in the thalamus, and the recurrent inhibition, originating mainly in layers 2/3 and 4. In contrast, we found no evidence of similar division and responses in excitatory infragranular neurons of layers 5 and 6. Our results are in agreement with recent experimental findings and shed light on the mechanisms responsible for the emergence of error neurons.

BACK